High Quality Content in Search Engines Perspective: Google vs Bing

How do we measure the content’s quality? How’s quality content looks like? I believe there is no exact answer for these questions. However, Google and Bing trying to describe how is the quality content looks like.

High Quality Content in Search Engines Perspective: Google vs Bing

High quality content in Bing’s perspective

To produce high quality content, Bing suggests you to avoid these things below:
1. Duplicate content.
2. Thin content.
3. All text or all images content.
4. Being lonely, which means there is no one share your content through social media.
5. Using translation tools.
6. Skipping proofreading.
7. Too long videos.
8. Excessively long pages.
9. Content for content’s sake, which means if you are producing content, be sure it’s valuable.


High quality content in Google’s perspective

Google wants you ask yourself with these questions below when you want to produce a high quality content:
1. Would you trust the information presented in this article?
2. Is this article written by an expert or enthusiast who knows the topic well, or is it more shallow in nature?
3. Does the site have duplicate, overlapping, or redundant articles on the same or similar topics with slightly different keyword variations?
4. Would you be comfortable giving your credit card information to this site?
5. Does this article have spelling, stylistic, or factual errors?
6. Are the topics driven by genuine interests of readers of the site, or does the site generate content by attempting to guess what might rank well in search engines?
7. Does the article provide original content or information, original reporting, original research, or original analysis?
8. Does the page provide substantial value when compared to other pages in search results?
9. How much quality control is done on content?
10. Does the article describe both sides of a story?
11. Is the site a recognized authority on its topic?
12. Is the content mass-produced by or outsourced to a large number of creators, or spread across a large network of sites, so that individual pages or sites don’t get as much attention or care?
13. Was the article edited well, or does it appear sloppy or hastily produced?
14. For a health related query, would you trust information from this site?
15. Would you recognize this site as an authoritative source when mentioned by name?
16. Does this article provide a complete or comprehensive description of the topic?
17. Does this article contain insightful analysis or interesting information that is beyond obvious?
18. Is this the sort of page you’d want to bookmark, share with a friend, or recommend?
19. Does this article have an excessive amount of ads that distract from or interfere with the main content?
20. Would you expect to see this article in a printed magazine, encyclopedia or book?
21. Are the articles short, unsubstantial, or otherwise lacking in helpful specifics?
22. Are the pages produced with great care and attention to detail vs. less attention to detail?
23. Would users complain when they see pages from this site?

In my personal opinion, Bing’s perspective is much clearer than Google’s perspective. It’s more practical and more realistic. Google’s perspective on high quality content is like a “perfect ideal content” in the unreal world! Who can write those kinds of content? Wake up Google!

Enjoyed this article? Subscribe to get more updates!

Natasha Jones is a 20 years-old girl who really passionate about technology. She spent most of her time by looking for any technology issues around the net. Once she get bored, she would take a walk with her lovely dog, Bimboo.

© 2011 spyontech. All rights reserved.